Weaponized Language

There is a lot of mystery and folk lore surrounding secret societies, most written off as “conspiracy theories,” but what is a conspiracy theory really? The term conspiracy theory was first used by liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s (a Jew) attacks on the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that played the greatest role in “weaponizing” the term due to the public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (speaking of video below). The CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report.” The dispatch laid the groundwork for making the term “conspiracy theory” a weapon to be wielded against individuals or groups calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question.

This memorandum’s effect on American politics and public discourse are explored in a book by Lance deHaven-Smith, a political scientist at Florida State University titled Conspiracy Theory in America. Dr. deHaven-Smith created the state crimes against democracy concept to interpret and explain possible government complicity in events such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, political assassinations in the 1960s, and 9/11. I won’t go into these subjects in this article, but if you want to research them yourself you will find it is no big mystery who is responsible for all of these things. It is always the same organizations for the same reasons; simply follow the money, it always leads to the same place.

This kind of weaponized language, and by extension thought and behavioral manipulation, is designed to control what topics people are comfortable discussing and how they are viewed by society if they do discuss them. By creating and using these weaponized terms, they are able to discredit and even create hostility towards individuals without even listening to or analyzing what they have to say. Those wielding these weapons are able to mold public opinion, perception and culture, and finally in the end, behavior. They are effectively creating taboo subjects to keep inquiring minds from looking into activities they don’t want exposed, and molding society at large to ostracize and punish those that do. This is a very Jewish mentality and tactic in nature since in the Talmud it states that Jews are free from blame for committing evil deeds if they manipulate others into doing them and don’t actually commit them themselves.

Thus R. Zera maintains that no penalty is incurred for indirectly causing one’s death.”(Talmud Sanhedrin 77a).

This of course only matters when it is for whatever arbitrary reason they choose, there are no restrictions or punishments for murdering gentiles if they have “sinned”.

It is permissible to kill the Righteous among Nations [Goyim] even if they are not responsible for the threatening situation,” he wrote, adding: “If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments – because we care about the commandments — there is nothing wrong with the murder.”(Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, in the recent book “King’s Torah”)

If you look back through history you will see how this time honored psyop tactic has been commonly employed by the Jews. We can see it illustrated in the below quotes by Hilaire Belloc and H. H. Beamish, where the Jews have attempted to create an environment where if someone simply mentions the fact that a person doing something shady is a Jew they are attacked as a bigot, just as we have seen them do countless times in history from Mel Gibson, Henry Ford, Walt Disney, Spiro Agnew to Adolf Hitler and the entire nation of Germany.

It was (is) the instinctive policy with the mass of the Jewish nation, a deliberate policy with most of its leaders, not only to use ridicule against anti-Semitism but to label as ‘anti-Semitic’ any discussion of the Jewish problem at all, or, for that matter, any information even on the Jewish problem…If a man alluded to the presence of a Jewish financial power in any region, for instance, in India, he was an anti-Semite. If he interested himself in the peculiar character of Jewish philosophical discussions, especially in matters concerning religion, he was an anti-Semite. If the emigrations of the Jewish masses from country to country, the vast modern invasion of the United States, for instance (which has been organized and controlled like an army on the march), interested him as an historian, he could not speak of it under pain of being called an anti-Semite. If he exposed a financial swindler who happened to be a Jew, he was an anti-Semite. If he exposed a group of Parliamentarians taking money from the Jews, he was called an anti-Semite. If he did no more than call a Jew a Jew, he was an anti-Semite. You cannot long confuse interest with hatred, the statement of plain and important truths with mania, the discussion of fundamental questions with silly enthusiasm, for the same reason that you cannot long confuse truth with falsehood. Sooner or later people are bound to remark that the defendant seems curiously anxious to avoid all investigation of his case…I say it was a fatal policy; but it was deliberately undertaken by the Jews.” (Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, pp. 160-161).

“In 1848 the word “anti-Semitic” was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word “Jew.” The right word for them is “Jew” . . . “I implore all of you to be accurate — call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat — that is your reward.” (H.H. Beamish, in a New York address, October 30 – November 1, 1937).

By simply calling something a “conspiracy theory” the implication is that the information being presented can be dismissed out of hand as simply “crazy talk” and that people with legitimate evidence and facts to support their claims of an alternate interpretation and conclusion (or the truth as we can now call it) are crazy kooks for questioning the official narrative. Let’s analyze this line of thought. The people and institutions with the power in our society, who control the money, information and institutions which are always trying to consolidate and expand their power and influence, whom we all know are corrupt, are attempting to imply someone should be dismissed and ostracized for questioning their narrative of events. Events that were orchestrated by them, in order to achieve an outcome that benefits their agendas. They get us, the public, to silence these individuals, rather than having to do it themselves which would bring additional scrutiny and provide further evidence of the corruption.

There are countless examples of how this tactic is used in society today by the modern “left”, and cultural Marxist groups, which is why they so fervently attack free speech and try to police speech and thought through PC culture. Political Correctness is effectively a culture control tool. They are attempting to control what is and isn’t permitted to be discussed by getting the members of that society to police themselves. It is no different than what is done in communist societies, where the state encourages members of the society to inform on family and friends through coercion, torture and bribery, creating an environment of fear and retaliation to keep subjects they deem “anti-revolutionary” from being discussed. They want to put your mouth and your mind in a prison. Communism is nothing but a new and improved form of Feudalism with the Jewish bankers as the Kings, and the Dukes, Earls and Knights all Jews appointed by them to “state” positions to rule over the non-Jewish populace.

Let’s explore the long term results of attempting to police ideas and language in a free society through culture and propaganda. This tactic, though quite easy to employ in authoritarian societies, has a tipping point where it becomes a double edged sword (or is it?) in societies that have laws to protect the freedom of speech. Let’s look at the layers and consequences of how this unfolds. The first layer, indoctrination through schools and propaganda from the media, the news, books, magazines, movies, music, video games, art etc; there is a reason the “Nazis” burned all of this when they gained power. These forms of pop culture are effective tools at policing thoughts and language by the society they are imposed on by indoctrinated cliques. A popular contemporary term for those infected with this ideological cancer is “Social Justice Warriors”.

The second layer is the reaction to this, there will be groups outside of these cliques of mindless ideological zombies that resist their attempts to try and indoctrinate us into their cult because we are sharp enough to see what is happening, but there will also be others that resist because they already hold a kind of indoctrination of their own such as patriotism or Americanism that have conflicting goals and ideologies. They may not understand what is happening exactly or the genius behind the authors and signers of the Constitution, but they believe in it none the less and will fight to defend it. We then have the “left” trying to control and police speech, and the “right” fighting to defend free speech. The “right” can now be categorized into two schools of thought with completely different motivations. One is staunchly conservative in nature and resisting due to whatever their ideological reasons are for being on the “right”, whether it be traditional patriotism, Christian beliefs, anti-government, individualism, counter culturism etc. whatever their individual reasons may be. But now you also have a large number of people that may be opposed to most “right” policies, centrists and individuals that were previously “left leaning”, that align themselves with the right over this single issue. The ones orchestrating all of this will be muddying the waters at the same time causing more division with propaganda through their control of the media in order to confuse people about everything in general to the point where they dismiss nearly all information and claims out of hand as being biased or agenda driven. Soon you can’t even have a conversation with the “opposing side” any longer in order to get to truth and create solutions to problems that are causing this ideological divide because those “brainwashed” by this tactic are incapable of even agreeing what the facts are or how and where to find them. Those affected on both sides will only believe sources they consider credible, which is to say they come from their “in group” or “right thinkers”, while dismissing any information that doesn’t come from an “approved” source or the “out group” “wrong thinkers”.

This is exactly what they want and how they create wars, that is to say divide and conquer. The centrists, or formerly neutral will be absorbed by the radicals because eventually they will be forced to pick a side; there is no centrist army I’m afraid. Of course those that are not traditionally tribalistic, or the “centrists” in this scenario will recognize what is happening and the folly in this line of thought, and will know sources always have an agenda behind them no matter what side you are on and you should consider evidence from all sides and do your own research on the accuracy of the information provided to come to your own conclusions.

The majority of people won’t do this however; they will receive their information and marching orders and execute those orders just as intended. Whether the people submit to the pressure of PC culture or they form two opposing factions and go to war, either way those orchestrating all of this win because they profit from the war monetarily and ideologically since no matter which side wins (the left in Soviet Russia and World War II). As long as the factions aren’t able to expose them to the opposing sides and bring those responsible to justice, they will simply start over which they have been doing routinely for millennia, only now with less “whites” in the world. This is the high stakes risk they are taking and why many Jews are just as much pawns in all of this as the rest of us and will pay dire consequences for the actions of these power players, as we saw in Germany. Unfortunately they have made their bed and now will have to lie in it, since they had every opportunity to police their own but, now we have to do it for them by first exposing them and then regaining monetary control by ending the Fed, then regain political control from the bottom up.

Knowledge is power; the only way to escape the matrix is through Gnosis. Now that you have awakened it is your responsibility to wake others. As the Aryan consciousness re-awakens The Black Sun rises again.

Coincidentally Abraham Zapruder, who was himself a Jew and 33rd degree Free Mason just happened to be there at the perfect time to film the entire thing and the Jew Jack Ruby killed the patsy, in order to make way for the first (crypto) Jewish President, LBJ, who later went on to cover up Israel’s purposeful and direct attack against the USS Liberty and sign the hart-cellar immigration act into law in 1965. Nothing to see here folks.

Bodhi Mantra

I am a computer scientist, researcher and writer. Son Of Saturn of the 4th Sun and guardian of the arcanum for the preservation of the Aryan legacy.


Leave a Reply to masonhater16Cancel reply